Translate this Article...
I don�t have a particular movie in mind for this post, but instead I want to meander through a few checkpoints in Italy�s postwar artistic and political history. While browsing at a bookstore recently, I came across an anthology of short works by Pier Paolo Pasolini entitled In Danger. The title of the anthology comes from the title that Pasolini chose for his last interview, �We�re All in Danger.� Several hours after the interview, Pasolini was murdered, run over several times by his own car. An apt title.
Before proceeding further with this essay, I must confess that I don�t actually know that much about Pasolini or his work. In fact, the only film of his that I�ve seen is probably among his least famous, 1964�s Comizi d�Amore (Love Meetings), a documentary in which Pasolini asks random Italians (the proverbial �man on the street,� I suppose) for their opinions on sexuality and gender issues. Alberto Moravia was interviewed, I recall, although he�s hardly just a �man on the street.�
But I know the key points about Pasolini. I know that he was a man of many hats, that he was an accomplished writer of poetry and prose before he turned to cinema, which he balanced with his literary work up until his death. I know that he was an enthusiastic supporter of communism. I know that he was gay and known to be gay in a time and a country when that can�t have been easy, to say the least. I know that he is the director of Teorema (1968), the inspiration of for Takashi Miike�s 2005 atrocity/masterpiece (depending on how you approach it), Visitor Q. I know that he was the director of Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom, which I have not seen, even though I�m told I should (I remember a (Slate?) article in which a movie reviewer talks about how he really doesn�t want to see Salo, and he consults with a bunch of fellow critics, and they all tell him, sorry, but you have to see Salo if you want to be a critic, and so he does, and it�s upsetting; this is not the place to talk about Salo. Maybe I�ll bring myself to see it at some point, and then I�ll talk about it at length). I know that Pasolini thought that consumerism was another form of fascism, and that he thought it was worse than the overt political fascism of Mussolini, because, whereas Mussolini�s fascism may have destroyed bodies, consumerist fascism destroys souls. I think he should have consulted with Primo Levi, who had experience of both kinds of fascism, and asked him which he thought was worse. And then I know that Pasolini was murdered in 1975, almost immediately after the completion of Salo.
An iconic picture of Pier Paolo Pasolini |
And in 1972, the elderly American poet Ezra Pound died in Rapallo, Italy, and was buried there. One does not immediately associate Pound�who was born in the Idaho territory in 1885�with the cultural and political turmoil of post-war Italy. His presence there seems anachronistic. Pound came to Europe from America in 1908, was a personal assistant to W. B. Yeats for a while, and ended up becoming a pivotal (or perhaps the pivotal) figure in Anglophone modernism (Hispanophone literature had its own modernism, circa-1900 or thereabouts, so it seems only fair to make the distinction). Pound wasn�t just a poet; he also held strong opinions about economics and politics, almost all of them appalling. He moved to Rapallo�the English humorist and aesthete Max Beerbohm also lived in Rapallo at the time; I�ve never heard of a meeting between him and Pound, but I�m sure it would have been worth seeing�in Mussolini�s Italy, which he found quite congenial. He embraced the Social Credit theory of economics, which his nowadays known, if it�s known at all, because of its association with Pound. Social Credit seeks to eliminate debt and sees the lending of money at interest�usury!�as being an atrocious evil. And who were the worst usurers? Sigh. The Jews, Pound would tell you. The Rothschilds and their chief enabler in Washington, President Rosenstein.
A wonderful picture of Pound in his youth. |
He was found not guilty by reason of insanity and was sent to the St. Elizabeth�s mental hospital, where he remained until 1958, writing more cantos and translating Confucian texts. Upon his release, he immediately returned to Italy and his beloved Rapallo. When a journalist asked him why he was leaving the US, he famously quipped, �It�s a mad house.�
And so he lived out his life in Rapallo. He later repented of his anti-Semitism, dismissing it as an �immature� prejudice. Whether or not he ever grasped the true repulsiveness of this prejudice is subject to debate. He was known to claim that a man named Ezra couldn�t be an anti-Semite. He pointed out that he�d dedicated his 1936 book Guide to Kulchur to Louis Zukofsky, a Jew, which is sort of like saying, �I�m not a racist! Here, look at my black friend!�
Pound's mugshot |
Well, the interview turned out to be downright sweet, if not particularly informative. Pasolini begins the interview by quoting Pound�s famous poem about Walt Whitman, �A Pact,� in which Pound essentially says, �I feel really uncomfortable with you, Walt, and I don�t like a lot of what you do, and I don�t like your approach to poetry, but you�re here, your presence is enormous, I cannot escape you, you seep into my poetry despite my best efforts to suppress you, so let�s reach an understanding.� Pasolini says that he feels the same way about Pound; despite Pound�s repellent politics, he�s a still a great poet, one of the greatest of his time, and most of the rest of the interview passes with Pasolini quoting various Pound poems admiringly and Pound responding with something to the effect of, �Why yes, yes, I did write that.�
The interview represents a poignant brush between two different eras and two very different personalities and worldviews. Pound dies in 1972 and Pasolini in �75.� By that point, surely any influence that Pound�s politics wielded on the Italian political scene, if he�d ever had any to begin with, must have seemed negligible in the extreme.
Imagine my surprise, then, when on December 13 of 2011, I found Ezra Pound had snuck his way into a news story out of Italy. In the city of Florence, five Senegalese street vendors had been shot, two of them fatally. The perpetrator was a far right-wing Italian nationalist and xenophobe, and he committed suicide after the attacks. In the BBC article that I read about the event, they mentioned almost in passing that the shooter had been associated with a neo-fascist organization called Casa Pound. The article did not elaborate on the name.
I went to Wikipedia and looked up Casa Pound. No article. I went to Italian Wikipedia and looked up Casa Pound, and there was an article, albeit one of the �stub� variety. I do not speak Italian, but I used the wonders of the internet to translate the article into crude, word-for-word literal English. I found that Casa Pound was a far-right organization that found inspiration in the political positions staked out by Ezra Pound, as well as by the more �usual suspects� of Italian fascism (rather ironic for an Italian nationalist group to be named after an American).
So Pound�s politics live on, despite his later efforts to downplay them, and despite his undeniable greatness in the literary realm. One wonders what Pasolini would have made of the Casa Pound killings, had he lived to them. Would he still have made his �pact� with Pound?