Translate this Article...
Picture me, dear reader, all geared up to watch Derek Jarman�s apocalyptic The Last of England, which promised to depict the nightmare of Thatcherism, in which, and allow me to quote extensively from Fandor�s synopsis, �he has Tilda Swinton stalk through the remnants of industrial England, encountering visions of fascistic slaughter and sacrifice. These nightmares are cut together with his family's idyllic home movies, a link with the past soon to be severed, all overlaid with bleak quotations from poets like T.S. Eliot and Allen Ginsberg, read in the stentorian tones of Nigel Terry.�
Well, first off, Tilda Swinton doesn�t appear on the scene until there�s only about fifteen minutes left of the film (it�s a younger Tilda Swinton; her eyes have become distinctly stranger looking as she ages). As far as I could tell, there was one short quote a-piece from Eliot and Ginsberg, and not even terribly original quotations. From Ginsberg, he has �I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving, hysterical, naked,� which is the most famous line in Ginsberg�s ourvre, hell, it�s one of the most famous lines in all of poetry, anyone can say it, it doesn�t even mean anything anymore. And the Eliot line is of course, �Not with a bang, but with a whimper.�
Now, The Last of England is a non-narrative montage film, and that�s just fine. Jean-Luc Godard�s epic �documentary,� Histoire(s) du Cin�ma, which purports to tell the story (or history!) of film, is similarly incoherent, and large portions of its sound-track consist largely of just Godard sententiously intoning �histoire(s) du cinema� along with the titles of the various episodes within the film, along with a few other catchphrases (it�s kind of like the Beatles� �Revolution 9� if that �song� was the soundtrack to a documentary and it went on for four hours). But in spite of what this may sound like, Godard�s Histoire(s) du Cin�ma is quite enjoyable, on the whole. Godard�s images are beautiful and melancholy and he knows how to juxtapose them to consistently surprising and aesthetically pleasing effect. The same cannot be said for Jarman�s hyperactive mess of a film, which consists of crude shots of scantily clad young men smashing things in a post-apocalyptic London which at times seems more like Gaza. The young men play with flares, smashes sticks and bricks, and, perhaps most memorably, fuck a life-size print of Caravaggio�s Amor Vincit Omnia.
Jesus, Jarman. |
Post-script:
I have written a review of Feng Xiaogang's Back to 1942 for Slant Magazine. You shoud all check it out here.